Hi Ted & All -
Talked with Mark, it looks like Friday, April 16th will be a good date to go over Pandoc/Markdown/documentation formats (unless you were really thinking Thursday the 15th, Mark). My grand plan is to have a set of little 15-minute demos of FOSS software I’ve found helpful, and set those around the half-hour mark (6pm). So tentatively with re-phasing we would have something like:
- April 1: Replace Excel with RStudio
- April 16: Write documents in Pandoc Markdown, exploring documentation formats
- April 22: Make a website in Markdown with Static Site Generators like Hugo
- May 6: Make a website with Gemini/Gemtext
- May 20: Replace Word with Overleaf/Latex
- June 3: Replace Powerpoint with Overleaf/Latex/Beamer/Metropolis
- June 17: Alternate shells: Fish shell & object shells
- July 1: Keep track of RLY BIG files with Git-Annex
We can move/replace/drop stuff based on interest.
Cheers,
-Art
On Mar 16, 2021, 12:30 PM -0600, Ted Pomeroy <ted.pome@gmail.com>, wrote:
NMGLUGers, Art and Mark, I think we can go ahead with the phase shift around Art's talks. Art and Mark, can you two set dates for April that do the phase shift and allow Mark to attend both of Art's next two presentations? We can use next week's session on the 25th for our usual random discussions of Gnu/Linux news and our own issues and preferences.
In particular it would be good for Art and Mark to get together on the dates and for one or both to get back to the list with the new dates.
Thank you, Ted P.
Works for me.
NMGLugers, May I suggest if no other considerations are voiced that we proceed by letting Art and Mark select a date in April to have Art do his presentation and from that date we 'shift phase' to that Thursday and subsequent two week interval Thursdays. Please respond either to make an alternate suggestion or correct this one so we can move forward. Thank you, Ted P, Santa Fe
On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 11:31 -0700, Ted Pomeroy wrote:
> Okay NMGLugers. How about re-phasing to allow Mark to join us more
> easily. In an entirely unofficial poll at last night's meeting there
> were no objections and 3 of 6 were in favor. We can reply to the list
> to see how everybody feels about this. If agreed we would have to
> pick a start date, but that is easy enough.
I have no objections. Are there any other considerations we should makebefore changing it?
_______________________________________________
nmglug mailing list
nmglug@lists.nmglug.org
http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org
_______________________________________________
nmglug mailing list
nmglug@lists.nmglug.org
http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org
_______________________________________________
nmglug mailing list
nmglug@lists.nmglug.org
http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org
_______________________________________________
nmglug mailing list
nmglug@lists.nmglug.org
http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org